https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30515 The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous application, emphasizing the lack of merit and the application being filed beyond the statutory time limit. It highlighted the necessity for establishing forgery through proper legal proceedings before the court could entertain such claims. The case revolved around a disputed signature in a restoration application, with the respondent ordered to pre-deposit duty demand, which was later waived. The Tribunal found no evidence of forgery and stressed the importance of a court ruling on disputed signatures for authentication. en-us Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30515 The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous application, emphasizing the lack of merit and the application being filed beyond the statutory time limit. It highlighted the necessity for establishing forgery through proper legal proceedings before the court could entertain such claims. The case revolved around a disputed signature in a restoration application, with the respondent ordered to pre-deposit duty demand, which was later waived. The Tribunal found no evidence of forgery and stressed the importance of a court ruling on disputed signatures for authentication. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30515