<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1092 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428147</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s estimation of profit at 8% of gross receipts under section 44AD of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Despite the assessee&#039;s argument and comparisons with other contractors, the lack of evidence regarding expenses led to the decision. The Tribunal found the estimation reasonable and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of providing supporting evidence in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1092 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428147</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s estimation of profit at 8% of gross receipts under section 44AD of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Despite the assessee&#039;s argument and comparisons with other contractors, the lack of evidence regarding expenses led to the decision. The Tribunal found the estimation reasonable and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of providing supporting evidence in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>