<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1089 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428144</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the deduction under section 54F for the investment made within the extended period under section 139(4) and permitting the deduction for renovation and brokerage expenses based on the evidence provided. The judgment emphasized a liberal interpretation of beneficial provisions and the importance of substantiating claims with adequate evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2022 08:21:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1089 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428144</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the deduction under section 54F for the investment made within the extended period under section 139(4) and permitting the deduction for renovation and brokerage expenses based on the evidence provided. The judgment emphasized a liberal interpretation of beneficial provisions and the importance of substantiating claims with adequate evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>