<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1069 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428124</link>
    <description>In insolvency proceedings, the Resolution Professional&#039;s role is limited to collecting, collating and verifying claims on the basis of the record and available information; the function is administrative, not adjudicatory. On that basis, the Tribunal upheld the reduction of the claimant&#039;s admitted amount where the materials included the loan documents, the corporate debtor&#039;s records and information from the RBI, as well as the arbitral award and related treatment of the security deposit and interest. The claimant was therefore not entitled to restoration of the higher claimed amount, and interference with the claim verification was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2022 08:20:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1069 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428124</link>
      <description>In insolvency proceedings, the Resolution Professional&#039;s role is limited to collecting, collating and verifying claims on the basis of the record and available information; the function is administrative, not adjudicatory. On that basis, the Tribunal upheld the reduction of the claimant&#039;s admitted amount where the materials included the loan documents, the corporate debtor&#039;s records and information from the RBI, as well as the arbitral award and related treatment of the security deposit and interest. The claimant was therefore not entitled to restoration of the higher claimed amount, and interference with the claim verification was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>