<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1060 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428115</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on M/s Auto Cars for late tax payment under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, as the dues were paid in full with interest. Additionally, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the recovery of un-discharged tax liability, classifying their services as &#039;goods transport agency&#039; rather than &#039;clearing and forwarding agent&#039; services. The tribunal rejected the merging of the two services for tax purposes, emphasizing their distinct taxability. As a result, the appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were overturned due to improper classification and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2022 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1060 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428115</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on M/s Auto Cars for late tax payment under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, as the dues were paid in full with interest. Additionally, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the recovery of un-discharged tax liability, classifying their services as &#039;goods transport agency&#039; rather than &#039;clearing and forwarding agent&#039; services. The tribunal rejected the merging of the two services for tax purposes, emphasizing their distinct taxability. As a result, the appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were overturned due to improper classification and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>