https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428110 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order. It ruled that the appellant was entitled to the SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/2001-CE, as the brand name "Ramee Guestline Hotel" belonged to their group and not an external entity. The Tribunal found that the demand for Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty was unjustified, as the earlier order had already decided in favor of the appellant based on the same facts. en-us Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Sep 2022 08:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428110 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order. It ruled that the appellant was entitled to the SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/2001-CE, as the brand name "Ramee Guestline Hotel" belonged to their group and not an external entity. The Tribunal found that the demand for Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty was unjustified, as the earlier order had already decided in favor of the appellant based on the same facts. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428110