<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1845 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304394</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer on specific issues such as disallowance of provision for contractual obligations, provision for warranty, and addition of retention money. The Tribunal upheld the allowance of depreciation on technical know-how. Compliance with legal standards and principles from previous judgments was emphasized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2022 08:17:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1845 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304394</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer on specific issues such as disallowance of provision for contractual obligations, provision for warranty, and addition of retention money. The Tribunal upheld the allowance of depreciation on technical know-how. Compliance with legal standards and principles from previous judgments was emphasized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>