<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1798 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304393</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal against the order of the CIT (A) concerning bogus purchases and commission addition for the assessment year 2010-2011. In relation to the bogus purchases issue, the tribunal restricted the disallowance to 7% of the purchases based on the assessee&#039;s NP and applicable VAT rate, emphasizing the importance of VAT figures. The addition was confirmed to this extent. Regarding the commission addition, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the enhancement made by the CIT (A) without providing notice or opportunity. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2022 08:17:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1798 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304393</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal against the order of the CIT (A) concerning bogus purchases and commission addition for the assessment year 2010-2011. In relation to the bogus purchases issue, the tribunal restricted the disallowance to 7% of the purchases based on the assessee&#039;s NP and applicable VAT rate, emphasizing the importance of VAT figures. The addition was confirmed to this extent. Regarding the commission addition, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the enhancement made by the CIT (A) without providing notice or opportunity. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>