<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1660 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304392</link>
    <description>Termination of shareholders agreements that materially altered a listed company&#039;s project structure, order-book exposure and economic position constituted price-sensitive information because publication was likely to affect its securities price. The company&#039;s CMD, having attended the board meeting approving termination, was treated as an insider who traded while in possession of unpublished price-sensitive information; a commercial need for sale proceeds explained motive but did not validate the trade, and loss avoidance supported disgorgement. CICPL and its directors were not established to have had a qualifying connection or access to unpublished information when they traded, and their lender-driven sale explanation was accepted. Escrowed unlawful gain was transferred to SEBI for the CMD, while CICPL&#039;s escrow amount was released.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2022 08:17:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1660 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304392</link>
      <description>Termination of shareholders agreements that materially altered a listed company&#039;s project structure, order-book exposure and economic position constituted price-sensitive information because publication was likely to affect its securities price. The company&#039;s CMD, having attended the board meeting approving termination, was treated as an insider who traded while in possession of unpublished price-sensitive information; a commercial need for sale proceeds explained motive but did not validate the trade, and loss avoidance supported disgorgement. CICPL and its directors were not established to have had a qualifying connection or access to unpublished information when they traded, and their lender-driven sale explanation was accepted. Escrowed unlawful gain was transferred to SEBI for the CMD, while CICPL&#039;s escrow amount was released.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>