<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1340 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304400</link>
    <description>The Appeals were declined as the Appellants did not file claims during CIRP, and the Resolution Plan had already been approved without provision for their dues. The Tribunal upheld the binding nature of approved resolution plans as per the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling, emphasizing the importance of following judicial decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2022 08:17:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1340 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304400</link>
      <description>The Appeals were declined as the Appellants did not file claims during CIRP, and the Resolution Plan had already been approved without provision for their dues. The Tribunal upheld the binding nature of approved resolution plans as per the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling, emphasizing the importance of following judicial decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>