<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (12) TMI 191 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304391</link>
    <description>Conversion to Christianity does not invariably and permanently extinguish original caste status under the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950. Where the caste&#039;s structure and usage permit readmission, and the community in fact accepts the person after reconversion to Hinduism, original caste membership may revive for Scheduled Caste purposes. On the evidence, repeated community recognition, participation in caste and temple functions, treatment of the children as Adi Dravida Hindus, and a special conference for readmission showed actual acceptance by the Adi Dravida community. The respondent therefore satisfied the relevant constitutional requirements for reserved-seat eligibility, and the challenge to his status failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 17:52:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (12) TMI 191 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304391</link>
      <description>Conversion to Christianity does not invariably and permanently extinguish original caste status under the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950. Where the caste&#039;s structure and usage permit readmission, and the community in fact accepts the person after reconversion to Hinduism, original caste membership may revive for Scheduled Caste purposes. On the evidence, repeated community recognition, participation in caste and temple functions, treatment of the children as Adi Dravida Hindus, and a special conference for readmission showed actual acceptance by the Adi Dravida community. The respondent therefore satisfied the relevant constitutional requirements for reserved-seat eligibility, and the challenge to his status failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>