https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304389 The right to an alternative plot under an acquisition scheme was treated as a rehabilitative benefit rather than an absolute vested entitlement. A claimant had to apply within a reasonable time and explain any delay. Because the original owner never applied within the prescribed period, the later claim was made after a long lapse, and the appellants had not asserted any independent claim earlier, the prolonged inaction was treated as waiver of the claim and a valid basis to refuse discretionary allotment. The claim for alternative allotment was rejected and no relief was granted. en-us Tue, 01 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Sep 2022 12:48:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304389 The right to an alternative plot under an acquisition scheme was treated as a rehabilitative benefit rather than an absolute vested entitlement. A claimant had to apply within a reasonable time and explain any delay. Because the original owner never applied within the prescribed period, the later claim was made after a long lapse, and the appellants had not asserted any independent claim earlier, the prolonged inaction was treated as waiver of the claim and a valid basis to refuse discretionary allotment. The claim for alternative allotment was rejected and no relief was granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304389