<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1047 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428102</link>
    <description>Cancellation of GST registration for alleged non-filing of returns for six continuous months was challenged on the ground that the cancellation order lacked reasons and reflected non-application of mind. The HC held that the impugned order did not disclose any rationale justifying such a harsh consequence and, being unreasoned, failed the constitutional requirement of non-arbitrariness under Article 14. The cancellation order was set aside and the writ petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1047 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428102</link>
      <description>Cancellation of GST registration for alleged non-filing of returns for six continuous months was challenged on the ground that the cancellation order lacked reasons and reflected non-application of mind. The HC held that the impugned order did not disclose any rationale justifying such a harsh consequence and, being unreasoned, failed the constitutional requirement of non-arbitrariness under Article 14. The cancellation order was set aside and the writ petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>