<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1040 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428095</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the benefit under Section 80IC of the Income Tax Act for the assessee, ruling that their unit qualified for the deduction due to its classification as a mineral-based industry. Additionally, the Tribunal found that Rule 8D(iii) could not be invoked without establishing a direct nexus between borrowings and investments, supported by legal precedents. The deletion of the amount under Section 14A was also upheld, as the assessing officer failed to provide reasons for rejecting the assessee&#039;s explanation. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s decisions were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1040 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428095</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the benefit under Section 80IC of the Income Tax Act for the assessee, ruling that their unit qualified for the deduction due to its classification as a mineral-based industry. Additionally, the Tribunal found that Rule 8D(iii) could not be invoked without establishing a direct nexus between borrowings and investments, supported by legal precedents. The deletion of the amount under Section 14A was also upheld, as the assessing officer failed to provide reasons for rejecting the assessee&#039;s explanation. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s decisions were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>