<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1016 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428071</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, emphasizing the need for corroborative evidence and the unsustainability of additions based solely on valuation reports or uncorroborated diary entries. It was reiterated that no additions could be made in completed assessments without incriminating material found during the search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1016 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428071</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, emphasizing the need for corroborative evidence and the unsustainability of additions based solely on valuation reports or uncorroborated diary entries. It was reiterated that no additions could be made in completed assessments without incriminating material found during the search.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>