<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1922 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304373</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) to allow the exemption u/s 54 for the assessee, as the purchase of the new property was within the extended time limit specified under section 139(4) of the Act. The Tribunal relied on precedents from High Courts and a previous ITAT ruling to support its decision, ultimately dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 08:23:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1922 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304373</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) to allow the exemption u/s 54 for the assessee, as the purchase of the new property was within the extended time limit specified under section 139(4) of the Act. The Tribunal relied on precedents from High Courts and a previous ITAT ruling to support its decision, ultimately dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>