https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304372 Impleadment under Order I Rule 10(2) requires the proposed party to be necessary for effective and complete adjudication. In an oppression and mismanagement petition under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, mere membership or directorship does not by itself entitle a person to be added as a petitioner. As the applicant showed no specific act of oppression or mismanagement against him and no prejudice from non-joinder, the Tribunal found no basis to add him as petitioner No. 7 and rejected the application. en-us Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Sep 2022 08:23:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304372 Impleadment under Order I Rule 10(2) requires the proposed party to be necessary for effective and complete adjudication. In an oppression and mismanagement petition under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, mere membership or directorship does not by itself entitle a person to be added as a petitioner. As the applicant showed no specific act of oppression or mismanagement against him and no prejudice from non-joinder, the Tribunal found no basis to add him as petitioner No. 7 and rejected the application. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304372