<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 131 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30493</link>
    <description>The Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order dated 3-11-97, affirming the rejection of the refund claim by the original authority. The appellant&#039;s challenge regarding the interpretation of the order, discrepancies in benefit availing, and duty calculation were dismissed. The Court emphasized the need for factual verification of the reversal of benefits under the DEEC Scheme and duty drawback, directing the parties to provide detailed worksheets for the determination of the amounts to be reversed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 131 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30493</link>
      <description>The Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order dated 3-11-97, affirming the rejection of the refund claim by the original authority. The appellant&#039;s challenge regarding the interpretation of the order, discrepancies in benefit availing, and duty calculation were dismissed. The Court emphasized the need for factual verification of the reversal of benefits under the DEEC Scheme and duty drawback, directing the parties to provide detailed worksheets for the determination of the amounts to be reversed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>