https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304368 Admitted signature on a cheque attracts the statutory presumption that the instrument was issued by the signatory and duly filled; on that basis, handwriting expert examination limited to the name and date portions was not warranted. The cited authorities were found inapplicable because they involved disputed signatures. No perversity was found in the Trial Court and Revisional Court orders, and the challenge to refusal of expert examination failed. en-us Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:08:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304368 Admitted signature on a cheque attracts the statutory presumption that the instrument was issued by the signatory and duly filled; on that basis, handwriting expert examination limited to the name and date portions was not warranted. The cited authorities were found inapplicable because they involved disputed signatures. No perversity was found in the Trial Court and Revisional Court orders, and the challenge to refusal of expert examination failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304368