<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 986 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428041</link>
    <description>HC upheld GST demand notice for Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA) supply. Court maintained interim order requiring 25% bank guarantee, rejecting appellant&#039;s challenge to jurisdiction. Emphasized appeal remedies available and declined to interfere with Single Judge&#039;s discretion. Extended bank guarantee submission time by three weeks, preserving procedural fairness without prejudging case merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 986 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428041</link>
      <description>HC upheld GST demand notice for Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA) supply. Court maintained interim order requiring 25% bank guarantee, rejecting appellant&#039;s challenge to jurisdiction. Emphasized appeal remedies available and declined to interfere with Single Judge&#039;s discretion. Extended bank guarantee submission time by three weeks, preserving procedural fairness without prejudging case merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>