<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 981 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428036</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, and granted the deduction under Section 10A for the hardware component as part of the export turnover. The court held that software and hardware are inseparable, with the export of software inherently including the hardware component. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) were found to have framed incorrect questions regarding the eligibility for the benefit under Section 10A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 981 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428036</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, and granted the deduction under Section 10A for the hardware component as part of the export turnover. The court held that software and hardware are inseparable, with the export of software inherently including the hardware component. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) were found to have framed incorrect questions regarding the eligibility for the benefit under Section 10A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>