<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 955 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428010</link>
    <description>For liquid cargo imports, customs assessment is to be made on the actual shore tank receipt quantity rather than the invoice weight. The earlier Board circular prescribing invoice quantity had been withdrawn, and the settled position was that assessment must follow the shore tank receipt basis. On that reasoning, the dispute was treated as no longer open, the assessee&#039;s position was accepted, and the contrary order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 07:39:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 955 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428010</link>
      <description>For liquid cargo imports, customs assessment is to be made on the actual shore tank receipt quantity rather than the invoice weight. The earlier Board circular prescribing invoice quantity had been withdrawn, and the settled position was that assessment must follow the shore tank receipt basis. On that reasoning, the dispute was treated as no longer open, the assessee&#039;s position was accepted, and the contrary order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>