<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 945 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428000</link>
    <description>Payment of the amount quantified under Form SVLDRS-3 within the stipulated time entitled the petitioner to the benefit of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 and issuance of Form SVLDRS-4. As the authorities proceeded on the premise that payment had not been made, despite intimation and supporting challans, the subsequent show-cause notice could not stand and was liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 945 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428000</link>
      <description>Payment of the amount quantified under Form SVLDRS-3 within the stipulated time entitled the petitioner to the benefit of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 and issuance of Form SVLDRS-4. As the authorities proceeded on the premise that payment had not been made, despite intimation and supporting challans, the subsequent show-cause notice could not stand and was liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>