<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1615 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304348</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to benchmark the independent international transaction of allowing extra credit using the average cost of total funds available to the assessee. Other issues raised by the assessee were not specifically addressed in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 07:38:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1615 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304348</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to benchmark the independent international transaction of allowing extra credit using the average cost of total funds available to the assessee. Other issues raised by the assessee were not specifically addressed in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>