<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1674 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304347</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO/TPO to verify and recompute the adjustments based on the guidelines provided, particularly considering the methodology for valuing RSUs and the appropriate interest rates for outstanding receivables and advances. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering both sides of transactions and adhering to established legal precedents in transfer pricing cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 07:38:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1674 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304347</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO/TPO to verify and recompute the adjustments based on the guidelines provided, particularly considering the methodology for valuing RSUs and the appropriate interest rates for outstanding receivables and advances. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering both sides of transactions and adhering to established legal precedents in transfer pricing cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>