https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304338 Prolonged non-payment of wages to employees of State-controlled public sector undertakings justified interim protective directions under Article 21, as the Court treated immediate relief as necessary to protect employees' life and human dignity rather than as a general declaration of State liability for the undertakings' debts. Bihar and Jharkhand were directed to make further deposits for arrears, while the Court refused to let a clarification application reopen issues already rejected. The ultimate inter se liability for BHALCO and allied corporations, and the final entitlement to salary and emoluments, was left to be decided in appropriate proceedings. en-us Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Sep 2022 19:18:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304338 Prolonged non-payment of wages to employees of State-controlled public sector undertakings justified interim protective directions under Article 21, as the Court treated immediate relief as necessary to protect employees' life and human dignity rather than as a general declaration of State liability for the undertakings' debts. Bihar and Jharkhand were directed to make further deposits for arrears, while the Court refused to let a clarification application reopen issues already rejected. The ultimate inter se liability for BHALCO and allied corporations, and the final entitlement to salary and emoluments, was left to be decided in appropriate proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304338