https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304337 In a bifurcation-related dispute over employees of an erstwhile public corporation, the Supreme Court considered how salary arrears should be allocated between Bihar and Jharkhand under the Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000. It treated the statutory reorganization framework, the Central Government's order under Section 65, and the States' prior conduct as relevant to fixing liability for different periods, and apportioned unpaid salary accordingly with adjustment for amounts already paid. The Court also declined to sustain a continuing claim for absorption in JHALCO, holding that the controversy should end with payment of dues, including interest and pay revision benefits taken into account in computing arrears. en-us Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Sep 2022 19:06:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304337 In a bifurcation-related dispute over employees of an erstwhile public corporation, the Supreme Court considered how salary arrears should be allocated between Bihar and Jharkhand under the Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000. It treated the statutory reorganization framework, the Central Government's order under Section 65, and the States' prior conduct as relevant to fixing liability for different periods, and apportioned unpaid salary accordingly with adjustment for amounts already paid. The Court also declined to sustain a continuing claim for absorption in JHALCO, holding that the controversy should end with payment of dues, including interest and pay revision benefits taken into account in computing arrears. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304337