<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 192 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30482</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the commission paid to the sister concern as a business expenditure for packing and forwarding charges. Relying on precedents and lack of contradictory evidence, the court dismissed the appeals, emphasizing consistency in similar cases and the absence of new material to challenge the findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 192 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30482</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the commission paid to the sister concern as a business expenditure for packing and forwarding charges. Relying on precedents and lack of contradictory evidence, the court dismissed the appeals, emphasizing consistency in similar cases and the absence of new material to challenge the findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>