<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 894 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427949</link>
    <description>Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act permits wide interim measures, including security for the awarded amount, at any stage before enforcement of an award. The fact that a stay application under Section 36(2) was filed earlier does not create an absolute rule that it must be heard first; the court may consider both applications arising from the same award together and apply common factors. In a money award, the court may have regard to stay principles applicable to money decrees under the Code of Civil Procedure. On the facts, the absence of a strong prima facie challenge to the award and the size of the award justified deposit/security, and the interim security direction was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:38:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 894 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427949</link>
      <description>Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act permits wide interim measures, including security for the awarded amount, at any stage before enforcement of an award. The fact that a stay application under Section 36(2) was filed earlier does not create an absolute rule that it must be heard first; the court may consider both applications arising from the same award together and apply common factors. In a money award, the court may have regard to stay principles applicable to money decrees under the Code of Civil Procedure. On the facts, the absence of a strong prima facie challenge to the award and the size of the award justified deposit/security, and the interim security direction was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>