https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304333 The court upheld the trial court's decision to decline the petitioner's request to examine a Handwriting Expert in a case involving dishonored cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner alleged tampering with the cheques, specifically altering the amount. However, the court found the differences in the writing of the amount not substantial enough to prove tampering. It also highlighted the limitations of determining ink age as unreliable. The court dismissed the petition, affirming the trial court's ruling due to the lack of merit in challenging it. en-us Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:37:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304333 The court upheld the trial court's decision to decline the petitioner's request to examine a Handwriting Expert in a case involving dishonored cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner alleged tampering with the cheques, specifically altering the amount. However, the court found the differences in the writing of the amount not substantial enough to prove tampering. It also highlighted the limitations of determining ink age as unreliable. The court dismissed the petition, affirming the trial court's ruling due to the lack of merit in challenging it. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304333