<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 889 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427944</link>
    <description>SC lifted provisional attachment after finding it exceeded statutory one-year investigation period under Section 83. Despite ongoing investigations, the court directed respondents to release attachment within two days and set aside the 28.09.2020 order. The ruling emphasized legal compliance while preserving the investigation&#039;s integrity without prejudicing future proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 889 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427944</link>
      <description>SC lifted provisional attachment after finding it exceeded statutory one-year investigation period under Section 83. Despite ongoing investigations, the court directed respondents to release attachment within two days and set aside the 28.09.2020 order. The ruling emphasized legal compliance while preserving the investigation&#039;s integrity without prejudicing future proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>