<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 884 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427939</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the disallowance of interest expenditure, legal &amp;amp; professional fee expenses, and warehousing expenses was dismissed by the ITAT. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the expenses were legitimately incurred for business purposes, finding no material contradicting this. The appellant failed to demonstrate any legal errors in the ITAT&#039;s decision, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as no substantial questions of law were identified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 884 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427939</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the disallowance of interest expenditure, legal &amp;amp; professional fee expenses, and warehousing expenses was dismissed by the ITAT. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the expenses were legitimately incurred for business purposes, finding no material contradicting this. The appellant failed to demonstrate any legal errors in the ITAT&#039;s decision, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as no substantial questions of law were identified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>