<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 71 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30466</link>
    <description>Interconnectivity usage charges received by a telegraph authority were examined for taxability as telephone service under the Finance Act, 1994. The charging provision was held to apply only where the telegraph authority provides service directly to a subscriber in relation to a telephone connection; interconnection usage between one telegraph authority and another did not satisfy that requirement. Relying on the statutory definitions and the Board&#039;s clarification, supported by the Law Ministry and the Attorney General, the text states that such charges fell outside the existing taxable service and were therefore not liable to service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 71 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30466</link>
      <description>Interconnectivity usage charges received by a telegraph authority were examined for taxability as telephone service under the Finance Act, 1994. The charging provision was held to apply only where the telegraph authority provides service directly to a subscriber in relation to a telephone connection; interconnection usage between one telegraph authority and another did not satisfy that requirement. Relying on the statutory definitions and the Board&#039;s clarification, supported by the Law Ministry and the Attorney General, the text states that such charges fell outside the existing taxable service and were therefore not liable to service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>