<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 871 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427926</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals, upholding the additions under sections 68, 69C, and 69 while denying the exemption under section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of timely justice and criticized the prolonged litigation and adjournments caused by the assessee&#039;s representative. The Tribunal agreed with the lower authorities that the transactions were manipulated to evade taxes, involving artificial gains and unexplained income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 08:19:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 871 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427926</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals, upholding the additions under sections 68, 69C, and 69 while denying the exemption under section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of timely justice and criticized the prolonged litigation and adjournments caused by the assessee&#039;s representative. The Tribunal agreed with the lower authorities that the transactions were manipulated to evade taxes, involving artificial gains and unexplained income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>