<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 870 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427925</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) for lack of fair hearing and legality concerns under section 147. The AO&#039;s addition of unexplained cash deposits and credit entries was contested. The NFAC found the dismissal lacking proper reasoning and granted the assessee a chance to explain before the CIT(A)/NFAC, restoring all grounds to the AO for a fresh decision. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of fair opportunities and timely compliance in future proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 08:19:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 870 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427925</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) for lack of fair hearing and legality concerns under section 147. The AO&#039;s addition of unexplained cash deposits and credit entries was contested. The NFAC found the dismissal lacking proper reasoning and granted the assessee a chance to explain before the CIT(A)/NFAC, restoring all grounds to the AO for a fresh decision. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of fair opportunities and timely compliance in future proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>