<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 867 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427922</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for both AY 2012-13 and AY 2013-14, confirming the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s use of Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) as the Most Appropriate Method (MAM) and the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) adjustments. The Tribunal upheld the adjustments made by the Revenue Authorities, finding that the assessee&#039;s methods and justifications were not in accordance with the law and the facts of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 08:19:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 867 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427922</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for both AY 2012-13 and AY 2013-14, confirming the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s use of Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) as the Most Appropriate Method (MAM) and the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) adjustments. The Tribunal upheld the adjustments made by the Revenue Authorities, finding that the assessee&#039;s methods and justifications were not in accordance with the law and the facts of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>