<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 187 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30464</link>
    <description>A licensed auctioneer selling cardamom was not treated as a clearing and forwarding agent under the Finance Act, 1994 because the activity was limited to auctioning goods brought by growers or dealers and earning commission for that service. The record showed no clearing or forwarding operations, and mere receipt or incidental storage of goods for auction did not change the character of the service. References to auction-related provisions and the Sale of Goods Act were used only to explain the nature of an auction sale. The activity therefore fell outside the taxable category, and the revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 187 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30464</link>
      <description>A licensed auctioneer selling cardamom was not treated as a clearing and forwarding agent under the Finance Act, 1994 because the activity was limited to auctioning goods brought by growers or dealers and earning commission for that service. The record showed no clearing or forwarding operations, and mere receipt or incidental storage of goods for auction did not change the character of the service. References to auction-related provisions and the Sale of Goods Act were used only to explain the nature of an auction sale. The activity therefore fell outside the taxable category, and the revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>