<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 852 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427907</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant&#039;s provision of CAT scores to non-IIM institutes did not constitute taxable &quot;Mailing list compilation and Mailing services&quot; as defined under the Finance Act. The judgment highlighted the distinction between the appellant&#039;s service and the taxable activity, emphasizing that the nature of the service provided, as outlined in the MoU, did not align with the criteria for service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 08:18:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 852 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427907</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant&#039;s provision of CAT scores to non-IIM institutes did not constitute taxable &quot;Mailing list compilation and Mailing services&quot; as defined under the Finance Act. The judgment highlighted the distinction between the appellant&#039;s service and the taxable activity, emphasizing that the nature of the service provided, as outlined in the MoU, did not align with the criteria for service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>