https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304308 A defendant seeking to dispute signatures on a pronote and receipt was denied expert examination of the ink's age because no scientific method was available to determine ink age with reliability. The court also treated the request as academic since the defendant's own position was that the signatures were affixed only as a witness and not as a borrower. On that reasoning, expert determination of ink age was not permitted and the revision failed. en-us Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Sep 2022 12:34:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304308 A defendant seeking to dispute signatures on a pronote and receipt was denied expert examination of the ink's age because no scientific method was available to determine ink age with reliability. The court also treated the request as academic since the defendant's own position was that the signatures were affixed only as a witness and not as a borrower. On that reasoning, expert determination of ink age was not permitted and the revision failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304308