https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304306 In a cheque prosecution where the drawer admitted the signatures, the Madras HC held that sending the cheque and related documents for expert opinion on the age of ink, writings, or signature was unwarranted. The Court reasoned that, after several years, such opinion cannot be obtained with scientific precision and would not assist the trial court in adjudication. Since the admitted signatures did not create a genuine need for such examination, the order permitting expert analysis was set aside and the revision was allowed. en-us Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Sep 2022 11:56:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304306 In a cheque prosecution where the drawer admitted the signatures, the Madras HC held that sending the cheque and related documents for expert opinion on the age of ink, writings, or signature was unwarranted. The Court reasoned that, after several years, such opinion cannot be obtained with scientific precision and would not assist the trial court in adjudication. Since the admitted signatures did not create a genuine need for such examination, the order permitting expert analysis was set aside and the revision was allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304306