<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 838 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427893</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, a Cooperative Society, by deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal determined that the penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was unjustified, as the appellant had rectified the return by offering the rental income for taxation before the penalty order. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to confirm the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 838 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427893</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, a Cooperative Society, by deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal determined that the penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was unjustified, as the appellant had rectified the return by offering the rental income for taxation before the penalty order. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to confirm the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>