<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 834 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427889</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the claim for interest paid to the partnership firm, though resulting in a net loss, was not inaccurate. Considering the facts and circumstances, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was not justified and ordered its deletion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:35:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 834 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427889</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the claim for interest paid to the partnership firm, though resulting in a net loss, was not inaccurate. Considering the facts and circumstances, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was not justified and ordered its deletion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>