<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 307 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty imposed on the appellant in relation to the discharge of service tax liability and the applicability of the Amnesty Scheme. The Tribunal found that the penalty was unjust, emphasizing that law-abiding assesses complying with tax laws should not be denied the benefit of waiver of penal provisions. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, concluding the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 307 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty imposed on the appellant in relation to the discharge of service tax liability and the applicability of the Amnesty Scheme. The Tribunal found that the penalty was unjust, emphasizing that law-abiding assesses complying with tax laws should not be denied the benefit of waiver of penal provisions. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, concluding the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>