<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 817 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427872</link>
    <description>The ITAT Visakhapatnam dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions totaling Rs. 3,67,88,800 under section 68 read with section 115BBE for AY 2014-15. The investments received as share premium from two companies were found to be legitimate, supported by proper banking channels, ledger accounts, and bank statements. The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order, ruling that the additions made by the Ld. AO were not justified as the investments were not unexplained cash credits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2022 15:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 817 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427872</link>
      <description>The ITAT Visakhapatnam dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions totaling Rs. 3,67,88,800 under section 68 read with section 115BBE for AY 2014-15. The investments received as share premium from two companies were found to be legitimate, supported by proper banking channels, ledger accounts, and bank statements. The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order, ruling that the additions made by the Ld. AO were not justified as the investments were not unexplained cash credits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>