https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427861 The Tribunal allowed the appeal for restoration of a struck-off company's name under Section 252 of the Companies Act 2013. Despite the company's failure to file certain documents, the Tribunal found restoration justifiable as the company was actively running and the non-filing was inadvertent. The restoration was subject to fulfilling legal requirements, including payment of costs and late fees. The Tribunal emphasized the company's interest in restoration and set aside the Registrar's striking off order, ordering the company's name to be restored to its original position. en-us Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:34:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427861 The Tribunal allowed the appeal for restoration of a struck-off company's name under Section 252 of the Companies Act 2013. Despite the company's failure to file certain documents, the Tribunal found restoration justifiable as the company was actively running and the non-filing was inadvertent. The restoration was subject to fulfilling legal requirements, including payment of costs and late fees. The Tribunal emphasized the company's interest in restoration and set aside the Registrar's striking off order, ordering the company's name to be restored to its original position. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427861