<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 796 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427851</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the Cenvat Credit claimed on supplementary invoices issued by the conversion agents. The judgment clarified the interpretation of Rule 9(1)(b) in the context of transactions involving the supply of goods for processing, emphasizing the absence of a sale between the parties as a crucial factor in determining credit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:34:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 796 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427851</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the Cenvat Credit claimed on supplementary invoices issued by the conversion agents. The judgment clarified the interpretation of Rule 9(1)(b) in the context of transactions involving the supply of goods for processing, emphasizing the absence of a sale between the parties as a crucial factor in determining credit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>