https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304301 A refusal to send a cheque for handwriting or ink examination was upheld where the accused had admitted the cheque and his signatures in the Section 313 CrPC statement. The Court held that no useful purpose would be served by expert examination in those circumstances. It further found that the challenged order was interlocutory, because setting it aside would not culminate in the criminal proceedings, and therefore the revision was not maintainable. The orders of the courts below were treated as in accordance with law, and interference was declined. en-us Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 18 Sep 2022 17:36:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304301 A refusal to send a cheque for handwriting or ink examination was upheld where the accused had admitted the cheque and his signatures in the Section 313 CrPC statement. The Court held that no useful purpose would be served by expert examination in those circumstances. It further found that the challenged order was interlocutory, because setting it aside would not culminate in the criminal proceedings, and therefore the revision was not maintainable. The orders of the courts below were treated as in accordance with law, and interference was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304301