<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 177 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30449</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for verification of documents and registers to ensure compliance with the law regarding the return of duty paid finished goods, procedural compliance under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, entitlement to Cenvat credit, and the appellant&#039;s claim for credit. The decision emphasized the importance of examining records in determining the validity of the appellant&#039;s claim for Cenvat credit under Rule 16.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 177 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30449</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for verification of documents and registers to ensure compliance with the law regarding the return of duty paid finished goods, procedural compliance under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, entitlement to Cenvat credit, and the appellant&#039;s claim for credit. The decision emphasized the importance of examining records in determining the validity of the appellant&#039;s claim for Cenvat credit under Rule 16.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>