<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 919 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304288</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal on the disallowance of interest on loans, deleting the addition for the holding company but sustaining it for the subsidiary. The appeal against the revisionary order under section 263 was fully allowed, quashing the CIT&#039;s order and upholding the depreciation claim on trademarks and licenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2022 12:31:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 919 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304288</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal on the disallowance of interest on loans, deleting the addition for the holding company but sustaining it for the subsidiary. The appeal against the revisionary order under section 263 was fully allowed, quashing the CIT&#039;s order and upholding the depreciation claim on trademarks and licenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>