<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 780 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TELANGANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427835</link>
    <description>Developer&#039;s GST liability in a land development agreement was examined by AAR, Telangana. The ruling rejected the landowner&#039;s application for advance ruling due to the developer&#039;s non-representation. The Authority emphasized that determining a third party&#039;s tax liability without their presence is procedurally impermissible, thus dismissing the application under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 780 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TELANGANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427835</link>
      <description>Developer&#039;s GST liability in a land development agreement was examined by AAR, Telangana. The ruling rejected the landowner&#039;s application for advance ruling due to the developer&#039;s non-representation. The Authority emphasized that determining a third party&#039;s tax liability without their presence is procedurally impermissible, thus dismissing the application under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>